PaleoRevenge
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,522
- Reaction score
- 1,339
- Points
- 113
Paleo-Revenge's posts are becoming so ludicrous that he posted a "map" which shows Daunian settlements to claim that a "different language" was spoken by Messapians. The map shows Messapic inscriptions in Daunian sites because the language is called Messapic and the people who spoke it are the Iapygians which formed several tribes.
They are the same exact people and they're not considered to belong to different people. Nobody claims so, not even Matzinger who considers the Messapic-speakers to be the fusion between Proto-Messapians of the Proto-Messapic-Albanian grouping + Cetina culture in Dalmatia from where they emigrated to Italy.
The ridiculous idea that Messapians are a different people from Daunians was revitalized by one banned person here on eupedia because he didn't like the idea that Daunians are J-L283 and R-Z2103.
The rest of his post belongs to the fantasy world of the Yugoslav nationalist Paleo-Revenge. It's a case study that he can't understand a single thing about what is going around him, but I guess that's one of the reasons why he's confined to writing ramblings on eupedia.
"Glasinac is the last culture to intrude into Dardani space, and it was firmly stopped, it made no headway beyond western Kosovo."
Keep dreaming and seek help for your anti-Albanianism.
Look at the concentration of Messapi inscriptions there is a clear pattern. Chaones, Dardani and Iapodes are not the same people in the Balkans. So they can't be the same in Apulia even if there was some admixture between each other in the "new world" by late Iron Age. Nor can that diaspora event be turned around and be presented as proof for the Balkans peoples, because in the Balkans these groups did not mix. Iapodians in Croatia are not PF5762-3, probably will not be Z2103 either. Chaones will not be J2b-L283, but PF5763.