Admixtools Central Mediterranean Imperial Romans: C_ITA_N/ChL-Steppe-CHG/IN Tripartite qpAdm model

Jovialis

Jovialis

Advisor
Messages
9,317
Reaction score
5,891
Points
113
Ethnic group
Italian
Y-DNA haplogroup
R-PF7566 (R-Y227216)
mtDNA haplogroup
H6a1b7
3MMQb8h.png


Eight samples that were modeled to have statistical robustness:

iT4Mipx.png

xZr4Gap.png

gJQOdhH.png

QY18mlK.png

DFXd3wL.png

M1gRjXe.png

3X445hQ.png

UpZ6hE7.png



Four samples that with inadequate p-values:



VUaxTIJ.png

EpxN0yE.png

7fW8fxV.png

SUBlcnq.png
 
Last edited:
FAM and R script found here, as well as the same model applied to Iron Age and Modern Italians:

Admixtools - C_Italian_N/ChL to Model Iron Age & Modern Italians

Only ITS5 had a sub-optimal p-vaule, but the other metrics looked good. Here are modern Italian populations using C_Italian_N and C_Italian_ChL, along with Steppe_EMBA, and Iran_N_CHG. Since TSI and the North can be modeled with WHG, it works with the ChL central Italian sample since there was...
www.eupedia.com
 
Not sure if it was poor labeling on the part of the Reich lab dataset (because I've found some errors...) But one or two samples that I had listed as Imperial Romans were listed as Late Antiquity. Again, the fact that there's some pretty egregious errors in AADR makes me wonder.
 
MA samples showing more of the same, I'll create graphic for all of the samples throughout the eras later on:

xaXNbrR.png

lXJtTPW.png

o94KWyg.png

postzOQ.png

p2KqYvY.png

gosZoaJ.png

ZMDWsba.png

7KoEDxk.png

QCJ4eDS.png

p84TpgB.png

faksFAc.png

E5Ws2Mq.png

kLu6yle.png

MDTSTvu.png

xg9960q.png


*R973 inconsistent results despite passing for statistical robustness in some iterations.
*R1290 inconsistent results despite passing for statistical robustness in some iterations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

This thread has been viewed 1051 times.

Back
Top