Popular articles |
---|
| Cultural Psychology |
---|
| History |
---|
| Historical Genetics |
---|
| Facts & Trivia |
---|
|
| |
Author: Maciamo Hay Written in July/August 2020.
I have explained the concept of Spiral Dynamics in here. I find the concept fascinating and extremely useful to study the evolution of societies in history, but also to understand the current socio-political situation in modern countries and forecast how societies are going to evolve.

The chart is an oversimplification as people within a same country move up the colour spiral at their own pace and settle at one level based on their specific needs. Not everyone in an orange dominated society will reach the orange vMeme. In fact, in most developed countries today a good part of the population (around 30-50%) is still in the blue (Order). That includes a majority of people who work at lower levels of the administration/bureaucracy, in the police and army, for religious organisations, but also lots of school teachers, hospital staff, clerks, secretaries, and anyone working in a very structured and hierarchical environment following rules from above (a boss, the state, one's religion).
People in the orange vMeme (Prosperity) are more self-driven, independent, competitive and ambitious. They include entrepreneurs, investors, bankers, stock brokers/traders, managers, directors, lawyers, realtors, accountants, consultants, advisers, marketers, sales people, programmers, software developers, etc. They make up 20-35% of the working population in developed countries.
What interests me here is to determine the percentage of people who have reached the green vMeme (Community) in various countries. The green includes the post-modern philosophy (relativism, subjectivism, pluralism), post-capitalist economy (sharing economy, participatory economics, commons-based peer production, open-source development), responsible and sustainable capitalism, ethical consumerism, concern for ecology and social fairness, egalitarianism, multiculturalism...
To assess how much a society has adopted the values of the green vMeme, I am going to give scores relating to ecology, fair trade, and collaborative/peer production, social progress, gender equality and LGBT acceptance.
I have considered other variables, but either could not find the data or they had to be rejected for some reasons.
- The percentage of not-for-profit organisations in a country, or even better, the percentage of people working for such organisations, would surely reflect the share of the population that has adopted green vMeme values. However I could not find any international comparison for that.
- The amount of donations to charities for environmental protection per capita would also be correlated with the green vMeme, especially if adjusted for GDP per capita, so that poorer countries are not unfairly disadvantaged with regard to the amount of money donated. An international comparison would ideally need to take into account the money donated by country to all environmental charities worldwide. This is because most large charities are located in a handful of countries like the USA, the UK or Germany, and some charities may be more popular in some countries than others. I could only find data for Greenpeace, but as some countries were missing and since including only Greenpeace would skew the data in favour of countries where Greenpeace is better known, I decided not to include the ranking in the overall green vMeme score below.
- The legality of cannabis in a country may indicate that it is more tolerant and relatistic, two green vMeme values. Nonetheless it is mostly a political issue that can change very quickly, as it did in some US states. The fact that it became legal in Nevada doesn't mean that people in Nevada in general are more green. Nowadays the only country where cannabis is legal in Europe is Georgia, which is certainly not a sign that it is high on the green vMeme. Cannabis used to be legal in countries such as India and Japan because it was used in religion (Hinduism in India and Shintoism in Japan's case). If anything cannabis is more likely to be accepted by the purple vMeme.
- Military spendings probably go down in countries dominated by green vMeme values. Yet it really depends on a country's geopolitical situation, such as the threat posed by its neighbours. Finland and Japan may have more reason to keep sufficient military spendings than Iceland or Portugal. In any case, a strong military is a sign of the blue vMeme and was included as a variable for that vMeme (here).
- The Gini coefficient indicates the level of income inequality or wealth inequality within a nation. It may seem that countries with a low Gini coefficient are more egalitarian. However, the Gini coefficient represents the actual state of economic inequality within a society, but what people wish for them to be. If a country had a large percentage of the population that valued egalitarianism it still wouldn't have much effect on how much other people earned. For example, inequaltities in the United States did not rise steadily from the 1980's to the present because Americans wanted to become less egalitarian or politicians took intentional measures to create vast disparities between the rich and the poor. The market did that, through globalisation, delocalisation, robotisation, etc. More socially minded countries can increase tax and redistribution of wealth, but that is not necessarily a sign of green vMeme values. The communists took that to the extreme and they were as blue as it get in the Spiral Dynamics.
1. Consumption of Fairtrade products by country
Country |
Fairtrade retail (in €/capita - 2015) |
GDP per capita 2017 |
Balanced |
Fairtrade score |
United Kingdom |
33.9 |
39,758 |
8.526585844 |
85.27 |
Ireland |
54.2 |
69,604 |
7.786908798 |
77.87 |
Switzerland |
57.7 |
80,101 |
7.2034057 |
72.03 |
Finland |
31.7 |
45,670 |
6.94109919 |
69.41 |
Sweden |
36.1 |
54,043 |
6.679866033 |
66.80 |
Austria |
21.6 |
47,718 |
4.526593738 |
45.27 |
Denmark |
18.1 |
57,533 |
3.146020545 |
31.46 |
Netherlands |
13.2 |
48,754 |
2.707470156 |
27.07 |
Germany |
12 |
44,976 |
2.668089648 |
26.68 |
Belgium |
10.2 |
43,289 |
2.356256786 |
23.56 |
Norway |
15.6 |
75,295 |
2.07185072 |
20.72 |
Luxembourg |
19.2 |
106,806 |
1.797651817 |
17.98 |
France |
6.7 |
38,415 |
1.744110374 |
17.44 |
Canada |
7.6 |
44,974 |
1.689865255 |
16.90 |
Australia |
9.6 |
57,613 |
1.666290594 |
16.66 |
Portugal |
2.7 |
18,882 |
1.42993327 |
14.30 |
Estonia |
2.5 |
19,793 |
1.263072804 |
12.63 |
Italy |
1.6 |
32,747 |
0.4885943751 |
4.89 |
United States |
2.9 |
60,055 |
0.4828906835 |
4.83 |
Czechia |
0.8 |
20,326 |
0.3935845715 |
3.94 |
Latvia |
0.4 |
15,625 |
0.256 |
2.56 |
Spain |
0.6 |
28,354 |
0.2116103548 |
2.12 |
Lithuania |
0.3 |
16,450 |
0.1823708207 |
1.82 |
Japan |
0.6 |
38,220 |
0.1569858713 |
1.57 |
Slovakia |
0.2 |
17,552 |
0.1139471285 |
1.14 |
Hong Kong |
0.4 |
61,000 |
0.06557377049 |
0.66 |
South Korea |
0.1 |
30,025 |
0.03330557868 |
0.33 |
The 'balanced score' column is the € spent on Fairtrade products per $10,000 of GDP.
Source of Fairtrade retail data (for 2015), except for New Zealand, which uses this data. Countries that aren't listed above have consumption of Fairtrade products under 0.1€ per person.
The GDP per capita (nominal) figures are from the United Nations for 2017.
When it comes to ethical consumption, the UK, Ireland top the list, followed by Germanic countries.
2. Peer Production : Wikipedia users & articles per 1000 speakers
Language |
Wikipedia users |
No of Speakers |
Users per 1000 speakers |
Articles/1000 speakers |
Average users+articles/1000 |
Wikipedia score |
Swedish |
735,785 |
9,197,090 |
80.00193539 |
405.6 |
242.8009677 |
24.28 |
Icelandic |
74,322 |
330,000 |
225.2181818 |
151.8 |
188.5090909 |
18.85 |
Norwegian |
604,819 |
4,453,000 |
135.8228161 |
215.5 |
175.661408 |
17.57 |
Estonian |
141,859 |
1,105,400 |
128.3327302 |
190.2 |
159.2663651 |
15.93 |
Welsh |
61,943 |
965,000 |
64.18963731 |
135.7 |
99.94481865 |
9.99 |
Hebrew |
658,170 |
5,302,770 |
124.1181496 |
50.8 |
87.45907479 |
8.75 |
Finnish |
454,977 |
5,392,180 |
84.37719067 |
90.4 |
87.38859534 |
8.74 |
Slovenian |
192,050 |
2,085,160 |
92.10324388 |
80.9 |
86.50162194 |
8.65 |
Dutch |
1,082,965 |
21,944,690 |
49.34975158 |
92.1 |
70.72487579 |
7.07 |
Catalan |
361,022 |
7,200,000 |
50.14194444 |
90.4 |
70.27097222 |
7.03 |
Macedonian |
89,303 |
1,407,810 |
63.43398612 |
75.6 |
69.51699306 |
6.95 |
Latvian |
92,267 |
1,552,260 |
59.44042879 |
65.9 |
62.6702144 |
6.27 |
Danish |
384,044 |
5,522,490 |
69.541819 |
47.1 |
58.3209095 |
5.83 |
Galician |
109,048 |
2,355,000 |
46.30488323 |
70 |
58.15244161 |
5.82 |
Lithuanian |
144,747 |
3,001,860 |
48.21910416 |
66.7 |
57.45955208 |
5.75 |
Serbian |
268,347 |
8,957,906 |
29.95644295 |
71 |
50.47822147 |
5.05 |
English |
39,433,068 |
505,000,000 |
78.08528317 |
12.1 |
45.09264158 |
4.51 |
Scots |
72,983 |
1,500,000 |
48.65533333 |
38.35 |
43.50266667 |
4.35 |
Spanish |
5,894,754 |
74,980,460 |
78.6172024 |
3.4 |
41.0086012 |
4.10 |
Slovak |
190,884 |
5,187,740 |
36.79521333 |
45.1 |
40.94760666 |
4.09 |
French |
3,837,876 |
74,980,460 |
51.1850154 |
29.8 |
40.4925077 |
4.05 |
Croatian |
240,709 |
5,752,090 |
41.84722423 |
38.1 |
39.97361211 |
4.00 |
German |
3,503,083 |
78,245,280 |
44.7705344 |
31.3 |
38.0352672 |
3.80 |
Hungarian |
450,671 |
12,606,130 |
35.75014695 |
37.5 |
36.62507348 |
3.66 |
Czech |
503,416 |
13,373,480 |
37.64285736 |
34.2 |
35.92142868 |
3.59 |
Bulgarian |
273,751 |
8,157,770 |
33.55708729 |
32.4 |
32.97854365 |
3.30 |
Polish |
1,044,638 |
38,663,780 |
27.01851707 |
36.7 |
31.85925854 |
3.19 |
Italian |
2,001,890 |
63,655,047 |
31.44903813 |
25.4 |
28.42451906 |
2.84 |
Irish |
43,814 |
1,930,000 |
22.7015544 |
27.4 |
25.0507772 |
2.51 |
Romanian |
527,008 |
23,782,990 |
22.15903047 |
17.2 |
19.67951523 |
1.97 |
Malay |
258,192 |
15,848,500 |
16.29125785 |
21.6 |
18.94562892 |
1.89 |
Greek |
307,634 |
13,432,940 |
22.90146461 |
13.4 |
18.1507323 |
1.82 |
Russian |
2,793,088 |
167,332,230 |
16.69187102 |
9.8 |
13.24593551 |
1.32 |
Japanese |
1,660,074 |
125,000,000 |
13.280592 |
9.7 |
11.490296 |
1.15 |
Turkish |
1,200,107 |
70,805,930 |
16.94924422 |
5 |
10.97462211 |
1.10 |
Portuguese |
2,432,890 |
220,000,000 |
11.05859091 |
4.7 |
7.879295455 |
0.79 |
Korean |
634,118 |
77,166,230 |
8.21755838 |
6.5 |
7.35877919 |
0.74 |
Arabic |
1,893,097 |
315,421,300 |
6.001804571 |
3.3 |
4.650902285 |
0.47 |
Cantonese |
203,609 |
62,221,560 |
3.272322327 |
1.4 |
2.336161163 |
0.23 |
Chinese |
2,967,583 |
1,197,294,060 |
2.478574896 |
0.9 |
1.689287448 |
0.17
|
The main problem with these statistics is that they are by language and not by country. It is fine for most countries, but not for languages spoken in many countries like English, Spanish and Portuguese. That's why I added regional languages like Basque, Catalan, Galician, Welsh, Irish and Scots to get a better idea of the local European production in these countries.
3. Ecology score
Country |
Recycling rate (2018) |
CO2 emissions per capita (2018) |
Ecology score (Recycling - CO2) |
Germany |
67.3 |
9.1 |
58.2 |
Slovenia |
58.9 |
7.5 |
51.4 |
Austria |
57.7 |
8.2 |
49.5 |
Switzerland |
52.5 |
4.8 |
47.7 |
Lithuania |
52.5 |
5 |
47.5 |
Netherlands |
55.9 |
9.5 |
46.4 |
Belgium |
54.6 |
9.2 |
45.4 |
South Korea |
59 |
13.6 |
45.4 |
Denmark |
49.9 |
5.8 |
44.1 |
Italy |
49.8 |
5.8 |
44 |
Sweden |
45.8 |
4.5 |
41.3 |
Australia |
58 |
16.8 |
41.2 |
France |
44 |
5 |
39 |
United Kingdom |
44.1 |
5.6 |
38.5 |
Finland |
42.3 |
8.8 |
33.5 |
Luxembourg |
50.1 |
16.9 |
33.2 |
Ireland |
40.4 |
7.7 |
32.7 |
Hungary |
37.4 |
5.4 |
32 |
Norway |
40.7 |
9.4 |
31.3 |
Spain |
36 |
6 |
30 |
Slovakia |
36.3 |
7 |
29.3 |
Poland |
34.3 |
8.8 |
25.5 |
Bulgaria |
31.5 |
6.3 |
25.2 |
Czechia |
34.5 |
10.4 |
24.1 |
Portugal |
28.9 |
5.1 |
23.8 |
Latvia |
25.2 |
4.1 |
21.1 |
Croatia |
25.3 |
4.7 |
20.6 |
United States |
35.2 |
16.1 |
19.1 |
Estonia |
28 |
14 |
14 |
Iceland |
25.8 |
12.1 |
13.7 |
Greece |
18.9 |
6.5 |
12.4 |
Japan |
21 |
9.4 |
11.6 |
Israel |
19 |
7.9 |
11.1 |
Cyprus |
16.1 |
6.3 |
9.8 |
Peru |
11 |
1.8 |
9.2 |
Costa Rica |
10 |
1.8 |
8.2 |
Canada |
24 |
16.1 |
7.9 |
Turkey |
11.5 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
Romania |
11.1 |
4.1 |
7 |
Argentina |
11 |
4.7 |
6.3 |
Uruguay |
8 |
2.8 |
5.2 |
Malta |
6.5 |
3.5 |
3 |
Mexico |
5 |
3.8 |
1.2 |
Montenegro |
5.5 |
6.3 |
-0.8 |
Brazil |
1 |
2.4 |
-1.4 |
Chile |
1 |
4.6 |
-3.6 |
North Macedonia |
0 |
3.9 |
-3.9 |
Russia |
7 |
12.1 |
-5.1 |
Serbia |
0.3 |
6.3 |
-6 |
Bosnia & Herzegovina |
0 |
7.8 |
-7.8 |
China |
30 |
7.2 |
22.8 |
Taiwan |
55 |
10.3 |
44.7 |
Singapore |
59 |
4.3 |
54.7 |
Qatar |
1 |
44 |
-43 |
Kuwait |
11 |
23.9 |
-12.9 |
Saudi Arabia |
1 |
18.6 |
-17.6 |
New Zealand |
58 |
7.1 |
50.9 |
Hong Kong |
30 |
5.7 |
24.3 |
Malaysia |
21 |
8 |
13 |
It was not easy to choose data that would reflect the environmental awareness, concern and action of individual citizens, as opposed to governments and companies.
I wanted to include solar panels penetration by country, but that would have given an unfair advantage to sunnier countries where PV panels are more useful and profitable. What's more, I could not find data on the percentage of residential homes equipped with PV, as opposed to companies and industries.
Likewise the total renewable energy produced in a country per capita is not a good indicator as it depends on government policies (just a few people) and the natural resources and opportunities available in each country, rather than actual desire to switch to renewable energy.
I wish I could have added the percentage of people donating to environmental charities (as opposed to all charities, which may be motivated by religion or other concerns in the blue vMeme), but I could not find such data.
That's why I had to settle for municipal waste recycling rates and CO2 emissions per capita. Nevertheless combining the two gives a surprising realistic score of environmental concern by country.
4. Social Progress & Gender Equality
Country |
Social Progress |
Gender Inequality |
Social score |
Norway |
90.95 |
0.044 |
86.55 |
Switzerland |
89.89 |
0.037 |
86.19 |
Denmark |
90.09 |
0.04 |
86.09 |
Sweden |
89.45 |
0.04 |
85.45 |
Finland |
89.56 |
0.05 |
84.56 |
Netherlands |
88.31 |
0.041 |
84.21 |
Iceland |
89.29 |
0.057 |
83.59 |
France |
87.79 |
0.051 |
82.69 |
Belgium |
86.77 |
0.045 |
82.27 |
Canada |
88.81 |
0.083 |
80.51 |
Germany |
88.84 |
0.084 |
80.44 |
Spain |
87.47 |
0.074 |
80.07 |
Luxembourg |
87.66 |
0.078 |
79.86 |
South Korea |
85.61 |
0.058 |
79.81 |
Austria |
86.4 |
0.073 |
79.1 |
Portugal |
87.12 |
0.081 |
79.02 |
Slovenia |
85.8 |
0.069 |
78.9 |
Italy |
85.69 |
0.069 |
78.79 |
Ireland |
87.97 |
0.093 |
78.67 |
Japan |
88.34 |
0.099 |
78.44 |
Australia |
88.02 |
0.103 |
77.72 |
Singapore |
83.23 |
0.065 |
76.73 |
United Kingdom |
87.98 |
0.119 |
76.08 |
New Zealand |
88.93 |
0.133 |
75.63 |
New Zealand |
88.93 |
0.133 |
75.63 |
Estonia |
83.98 |
0.091 |
74.88 |
Cyprus |
83.14 |
0.086 |
74.54 |
Israel |
81.44 |
0.1 |
71.44 |
Czech Republic |
84.36 |
0.137 |
70.66 |
Greece |
82.48 |
0.122 |
70.28 |
Poland |
81.25 |
0.12 |
69.25 |
Lithuania |
81.3 |
0.124 |
68.9 |
Croatia |
79.21 |
0.122 |
67.01 |
United States |
83.62 |
0.182 |
65.42 |
Latvia |
80.42 |
0.169 |
63.52 |
Malta |
82.63 |
0.195 |
63.13 |
Slovakia |
80.43 |
0.19 |
61.43 |
Serbia |
71.59 |
0.161 |
55.49 |
North Macedonia |
68.92 |
0.145 |
54.42 |
Bulgaria |
76.17 |
0.218 |
54.37 |
Hungary |
78.77 |
0.258 |
52.97 |
Costa Rica |
80.65 |
0.285 |
52.15 |
Chile |
80.02 |
0.288 |
51.22 |
Uruguay |
77.77 |
0.275 |
50.27 |
Qatar |
69.37 |
0.202 |
49.17 |
China |
64.54 |
0.163 |
48.24 |
Malaysia |
74.17 |
0.274 |
46.77 |
Russia |
69.71 |
0.255 |
44.21 |
Romania |
74.81 |
0.316 |
43.21 |
Saudi Arabia |
63.95 |
0.224 |
41.55 |
Argentina |
76.86 |
0.354 |
41.46 |
Mexico |
71.51 |
0.334 |
38.11 |
Turkey |
67.49 |
0.305 |
36.99 |
Brazil |
72.87 |
0.386 |
34.27 |
Peru |
71.31 |
0.381 |
33.21 |
The reflection of egalitarian, fairness and equal opportunities can be encapsulated in a combination of two indices. The first is the Social Progress Index, a complex index that takes into account basic human needs, health, environment, education, access to information, personal rights, personal freedoms and choices, social inclusiveness of LGBT and ethnic minorities, equal opportunities by gender and socioeconomic status, etc. The second is the United Nations' Gender Inequality Index, a negative score which I deducted (after multiplying by 100 as it was rated on 1 and not 100) to obtain an overall social score. I know that gender equality was already included in the social progress index, but I felt it was important to give it more weight as gender equality is a very important value of the green vMeme.
5. LGBT Acceptance
The 5th dimension is social acceptance of LGBT people. It is based on a 2019 global report of the same name by the Williams Institute at UCLA. The data is for the period 2014-2017.
Country |
UCLA 2017 |
Score in percent |
Iceland |
8.9 |
89 |
Netherlands |
8.6 |
86 |
Canada |
8.2 |
82 |
Norway |
8.2 |
82 |
Spain |
8.1 |
81 |
Belgium |
7.9 |
79 |
Denmark |
7.9 |
79 |
Ireland |
7.9 |
79 |
Sweden |
7.9 |
79 |
Luxembourg |
7.7 |
77 |
United Kingdom |
7.7 |
77 |
Malta |
7.6 |
76 |
Uruguay |
7.6 |
76 |
New Zealand |
7.5 |
75 |
Finland |
7.4 |
74 |
Germany |
7.4 |
74 |
Switzerland |
7.4 |
74 |
Australia |
7.3 |
73 |
United States |
7.2 |
72 |
France |
7.1 |
71 |
Argentina |
6.9 |
69 |
Austria |
6.8 |
68 |
Brazil |
6.8 |
68 |
Chile |
6.7 |
67 |
Hong Kong |
6.5 |
65 |
Italy |
6.4 |
64 |
Portugal |
6.4 |
64 |
Mexico |
6.3 |
63 |
Costa Rica |
6.1 |
61 |
Czechia |
6 |
60 |
Slovenia |
5.9 |
59 |
Taiwan |
5.7 |
57 |
Israel |
5.4 |
54 |
Peru |
5.3 |
53 |
Croatia |
5.2 |
52 |
Cyprus |
5.1 |
51 |
Greece |
5 |
50 |
Slovakia |
5 |
50 |
Estonia |
4.9 |
49 |
Hungary |
4.9 |
49 |
Japan |
4.9 |
49 |
South Korea |
4.9 |
49 |
Poland |
4.8 |
48 |
Singapore |
4.8 |
48 |
Bulgaria |
4.6 |
46 |
Latvia |
4.4 |
44 |
Turkey |
4.4 |
44 |
Serbia |
4.2 |
42 |
Malaysia |
4.2 |
42 |
Lithuania |
4.1 |
41 |
Romania |
4.1 |
41 |
China |
3.9 |
39 |
Kuwait |
3.5 |
35 |
Russia |
3.4 |
34 |
Qatar |
3.2 |
32 |
North Macedonia
|
3 |
30 |
Saudi Arabia |
3 |
30 |
Overall score
I gave a score on 100 for the first four categories, made an average in percent then added a custom Wikipedia score to the total as a bonus. In other words: (ecology + social + fairtrade + LGBT)/4 + Wikipedia.
Unsurprisingly Sweden tops the ranking for all values associated with the green vMeme. Note that no data was available for Fairtrade for countries like Iceland, Malta, Israel or Singapore, so their overall score is a bit different than what it should be.
The levels of the spiral are about values and mindset. Even though the 6th level, or green vMeme, corresponds to a postmodern or post-capitalist society, the five factors taken into account in my assessment are purely about values and not wealth or GDP per capita. That's why countries like Slovenia, Estonia and Lithuania can outperform economic powerhouses like the United States or Australia. In fact Luxembourg, which has the highest GDP per capita in the Western world, only gets an average score here. Countries obsessed with making money are often dominated by the orange vMeme (5th level). With too many people stuck in the orange mindset, it's only logical that fewer move on to the green level of consciousness, which is about quality of life rather than getting rich at all costs.
Country |
Ecology score |
Social score |
Fairtrade score |
LGBT score |
TOTAL |
Wikipedia score |
Overall score |
Sweden |
41.3 |
85.45 |
66.8 |
79 |
68.14 |
24.28 |
92.42 |
Iceland |
13.7 |
83.59 |
|
89 |
62.10 |
18.85 |
80.95 |
Finland |
33.5 |
84.56 |
69.41 |
74 |
65.37 |
8.74 |
74.11 |
Switzerland |
47.7 |
86.19 |
72.03 |
74 |
69.98 |
3.9 |
73.88 |
United Kingdom |
38.5 |
76.08 |
85.27 |
77 |
69.21 |
4.4 |
73.61 |
Norway |
31.3 |
86.55 |
20.72 |
82 |
55.14 |
17.57 |
72.71 |
Ireland |
32.7 |
78.67 |
77.87 |
79 |
67.06 |
3.51 |
70.57 |
Netherlands |
46.4 |
84.21 |
27.07 |
86 |
60.92 |
7.07 |
67.99 |
Denmark |
44.1 |
86.09 |
31.46 |
79 |
60.16 |
5.83 |
65.99 |
Austria |
49.5 |
79.1 |
45.27 |
68 |
60.47 |
3.8 |
64.27 |
Germany |
58.2 |
80.44 |
26.68 |
74 |
59.83 |
3.8 |
63.63 |
Belgium |
45.4 |
82.27 |
23.56 |
79 |
57.56 |
6 |
63.56 |
New Zealand |
50.9 |
75.63 |
32.07 |
75 |
58.40 |
4.5 |
62.90 |
Singapore |
54.7 |
76.73 |
|
48 |
59.81 |
0.17 |
59.98 |
Australia |
41.2 |
77.72 |
16.66 |
73 |
52.15 |
4.5 |
56.65 |
France |
39 |
82.69 |
17.44 |
71 |
52.53 |
4.05 |
56.58 |
Slovenia |
51.4 |
78.9 |
0 |
59 |
47.33 |
8.65 |
55.98 |
Luxembourg |
33.2 |
79.86 |
17.98 |
77 |
52.01 |
3.9 |
55.91 |
Israel |
11.1 |
71.44 |
|
54 |
45.51 |
8.75 |
54.26 |
Estonia |
14 |
74.88 |
12.63 |
49 |
37.63 |
15.93 |
53.56 |
Spain |
30 |
80.07 |
2.12 |
81 |
48.30 |
3.8 |
52.10 |
Canada |
7.9 |
80.51 |
16.9 |
82 |
46.83 |
4.5 |
51.33 |
Taiwan |
44.7 |
|
|
57 |
50.85 |
0.17 |
51.02 |
Portugal |
23.8 |
79.02 |
14.3 |
64 |
45.28 |
5.7 |
50.98 |
Italy |
44 |
78.79 |
4.89 |
64 |
47.92 |
2.84 |
50.76 |
Malta |
3 |
63.13 |
|
76 |
47.38 |
|
47.38 |
Lithuania |
47.5 |
68.9 |
1.82 |
41 |
39.81 |
5.75 |
45.56 |
United States |
19.1 |
65.42 |
4.83 |
72 |
40.34 |
4.5 |
44.84 |
South Korea |
45.4 |
79.81 |
0.33 |
49 |
43.64 |
0.74 |
44.38 |
Czechia |
24.1 |
70.66 |
3.94 |
60 |
39.68 |
3.59 |
43.27 |
Slovakia |
29.3 |
61.43 |
1.14 |
50 |
35.47 |
4.09 |
39.56 |
Latvia |
21.1 |
63.52 |
2.56 |
44 |
32.80 |
6.27 |
39.07 |
Croatia |
20.6 |
67.01 |
0 |
52 |
34.90 |
4 |
38.90 |
Poland |
25.5 |
69.25 |
0 |
48 |
35.69 |
3.19 |
38.88 |
Hungary |
32 |
52.97 |
0 |
49 |
33.49 |
3.66 |
37.15 |
Uruguay |
5.2 |
50.27 |
0 |
76 |
32.87 |
4.10 |
36.97 |
Japan |
11.6 |
78.44 |
1.57 |
49 |
35.15 |
1.15 |
36.30 |
Cyprus |
9.8 |
74.54 |
0 |
51 |
33.84 |
1.82 |
35.66 |
Greece |
12.4 |
70.28 |
0 |
50 |
33.17 |
1.82 |
34.99 |
Bulgaria |
25.2 |
54.37 |
0 |
46 |
31.39 |
3.3 |
34.69 |
Costa Rica |
8.2 |
52.15 |
0 |
61 |
30.34 |
4.10 |
34.44 |
Argentina |
6.3 |
41.46 |
0 |
69 |
29.19 |
4.10 |
33.29 |
Chile |
-3.6 |
51.22 |
0 |
67 |
28.66 |
4.10 |
32.76 |
Hong Kong |
24.3 |
|
0.66 |
65 |
29.99 |
0.23 |
30.22 |
Mexico |
1.2 |
38.11 |
0 |
63 |
25.58 |
4.10 |
29.68 |
Peru |
9.2 |
33.21 |
0 |
53 |
23.85 |
4.10 |
27.95 |
Serbia |
-6 |
55.49 |
0 |
42 |
22.87 |
5.05 |
27.92 |
China |
22.8 |
48.24 |
0 |
39 |
27.51 |
0.17 |
27.68 |
Malaysia |
13 |
46.77 |
0 |
42 |
25.44 |
1.89 |
27.33 |
North Macedonia |
-3.9 |
54.42 |
0 |
30 |
20.13 |
6.95 |
27.08 |
Brazil |
-1.4 |
34.27 |
0 |
68 |
25.22 |
0.79 |
26.01 |
Romania |
7 |
43.21 |
0 |
41 |
22.80 |
1.97 |
24.77 |
Turkey |
7.1 |
36.99 |
0 |
44 |
22.02 |
1.1 |
23.12 |
Russia |
-5.1 |
44.21 |
0 |
34 |
18.28 |
1.32 |
19.60 |
Saudi Arabia |
-17.6 |
41.55 |
0 |
30 |
13.49 |
0.47 |
13.96 |
Qatar |
-43 |
49.17 |
0 |
32 |
9.54 |
0.47 |
10.01 |
Kuwait |
-12.9 |
|
0 |
35 |
7.37 |
0.47 |
7.84 |
Follow-up

Discuss this article on the Eupedia Forum
|