Ike
Regular Member
- Messages
- 1,128
- Reaction score
- 93
- Points
- 48
Because they are the only ones that you react upon. I already tried with classic example like : group of people A, trying to depart from a country B, and Union C approves it. Then later a group of people D, trying to depart from a country E, but group C disapproves that. Yet you see no problems with that, so I was forced to pull some more basic examples.Why your mind always looks for sexual or sadistic analogies?
They are able, but they wouldn't be protesting against their own country, government and happiness. Ukraine was not the case like Germany 1933. where you were voting for or against something that would have vast social consequences. It was just monetary policy and economic affiliations in question, and that is not something you risk your life for, especially when the economic situation is quite clear the improvement was not to be seen so fast in any scenario.Regardless, do you want to say that there is possibility that these unhappy Ukrainians are able to go into the streets and protest, just because they are unhappy with current situation? Are they able to protest without money from external sources?
Yes, in fact they did. Many of my countrymen were offered lollipops and they fell for it. Now when the violation is over, and they are firmly tied in the basement they are starting to realize what they've got themselves into.Did they offer lollipop to you, and created these images?
From what I've seen you write here, one would not expect you to have any empathy with the victims.No, I don't have them although I'm watching news every day.
The only pattern I see is that I waste my time trying to simplify you a complex international problem into a classic criminal act between two people, that would be more simple for you to visualize, but you yet somehow always end up on some weird part of the street. It's either that you are somehow obsessed with sexual stuff, or you're just evading the subject...Seems like one needs to have susceptible mind for this type of images to take hold. It might be very disturbing by itself, and it could be noticed in every second of your posts. For all the people on Eupedia it is just you who comes up with these disturbing sexual imagery at every occasion. Do you think it means something? Do you see the pattern?
I've given you an exact names of the persons who received money from CIA to go to Ukraine to organize groups that would overthrow the government, and you're giving me a French revolution and a hint that it wasn't started by the CIA.Wasn't it you who blames CIA for every unrest and revolution of last decades? If you didn't mean that you shouldn't have written that. Otherwise we can perceive this logic as very childish indeed.
And now it bothers you I said that you act like readers of your posts have no brains....
You don't see them is because you're closing your eyes on purpose - because it feels nice to live a happy and wealthy life upon misery of other nations.Of course not, I'm just lamenting your vision impediment to see CIA everywhere.
Guess there are more people out there who are not willing to compromise their moral integrity just for the sake of their bank account. Thanx for recommendation, I will surely put it on Speed Dial and read some of that stuff...That is surprising, because every article I find there could have been written by you, or you could have been an adviser to the authors.
Just with the statement. Deadly serious. No sarcasm sadlyWith the statement or the sarcasm, which is a reversed logic?