• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Genetic study Ancient DNA indicates 3,000 years of genetic continuity in the Northern Iranian Plateau, from the Copper Age to the Sassanid Empire

Maciamo

Veteran member
Admin
Messages
10,663
Reaction score
4,585
Points
113
Location
Lothier
Ethnic group
Italo-celto-germanic
A new paper about Iran/Persia.

Nature: Ancient DNA indicates 3,000 years of genetic continuity in the Northern Iranian Plateau, from the Copper Age to the Sassanid Empire

Abstract

"In this study, we present new ancient DNA data from prehistoric and historic populations of the Iranian Plateau. By analysing 50 samples from nine archaeological sites across Iran, we report 23 newly sequenced mitogenomes and 13 nuclear genomes, spanning 4700 BCE to 1300 CE. We integrate an extensive reference sample set of previously published ancient DNA datasets from Western and South-Central Asia, enhancing our understanding of genetic continuity and diversity within ancient Iranian populations. A new Early Chalcolithic sample, predating all other Chalcolithic genomes from Iran, demonstrates mostly Early Neolithic Iranian genetic ancestry. This finding reflects long-term cultural and biological continuity in and around the Zagros area, alongside evidence of some western genetic influence. Our sample selection prioritizes northern Iran, with a particular focus on the Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sassanid periods (355 BCE–460 CE). The genetic profiles of historical samples from this region position them as intermediates on an east-west genetic cline across the Persian Plateau. They also exhibit strong connections to local and South-Central Asian Bronze Age populations, underscoring enduring genetic connections across these regions. Diachronic analyses of uniparental lineages on the Iranian Plateau further highlight population stability from prehistoric to modern times."

1747138570879.jpeg




There are not many Y-DNA samples but those available appear to be neatly divided by historical period. The two Chalcolithic ones are R2a2b1. The six samples from the Achaemenid Empire are all J2b (mostly J2b2a), and the Parthian samples include five J1a2a and two J2a. Of course that doesn't mean much as there are so few samples from each period.
 
Last edited:
A major breakthrough and a decisive paper. The Parthian samples from Liarsangbon in Gilan from our rare Y-DNA haplogroups, J1a2a2a~ J-FGC6141 or J-FGC6031, https://www.yfull.com/tree/J-FGC6031/
I am extremely happy to find strategic ancient Iranian Y-DNA (in my view Proto-Indo-European descendent groups from Northern Iran and the Caspian Sea) with my Brazilian-Portuguese lineage !
 
There are not many Y-DNA samples but those available appear to be neatly divided by historical period. The two Chalcolithic ones are R2a2b1. The six samples from the Achaemenid Empire are all J2b (mostly J2b2a), and the Parthian samples include five J1a2a and two J2a. Of course that doesn't mean much as there are so few samples from each period.

Are they are likely J2b2a-M241, Maciamo?

 
The earliest Indo-European peoples who used the cuneiform script to write their languages were Hittites and Persians, both of them had no Steppe-ancestry but CHG/Iranian ancestry, another known ancient Indo-European people who had a writing system were Mycenaeans, they had also CHG/Iranian ancestry.
 
The earliest Indo-European peoples who used the cuneiform script to write their languages were Hittites and Persians, both of them had no Steppe-ancestry but CHG/Iranian ancestry, another known ancient Indo-European people who had a writing system were Mycenaeans, they had also CHG/Iranian ancestry.
What you're omitting is that the Mycenaeans also had steppe ancestry.
 
the references pop's of this components breaking ate not too much reliable, IMO, and contradict other studies !!!
I answer myself and MOJA: I wrote too quickly without to search seriously. In fact these %'s seem from the SOuthern Arc famous paper. The namings were mistaking for me.
TUR is surely for Turkey Marmara or some 'anatolian' reference, SRB Iron is for Iron Gates HG's. I didn't see these numbers in the survey but their additionary tables are very small and uneasy to read. So I apologize, these numbers would be true in their system of analyse which doesn't integrate the 'steppe' component (some kind of EHG+CHGlike).
So their Greek sample had no EHG so surely no 'steppe'. But other samples of Mycenians had this 'steppe' component, even if uneven and weak (it's said in the paper), but stronger than among Minoans.
Sorry for the lost of time!
 
Back
Top