Search results

So slaves and merchants created the Roman empire?!

Don't fool ourselves, those are Indo-European Italic people, not slaves or merchants.

"For each individual from the casts, ancestry related to Anatolia Neolithic farmers (TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N) and/or Levantine Pre-Pottery Neolithic farmers (Levant_PPN) composes the largest inferred proportion (48%–75%), whereas the second-largest proportion is inferred to derive from people...

The only reason is that the Indo-European Italic people were those who had the Near Eastern ancestry, Etruscans and other non-Indo-European people were natives.

No, Proto-Uralic was agglutinative, PIE was closer to Proto-Semitic which also a fusional language.

Of course you know, not an international team of over 80 language specialists who strongly believe Indo-European languages originated in the south of the Caucasus and the West Asia: https://www.mpg.de/20666229/0725-evan-origin-of-the-indo-european-languages-150495-x

Who is "Iosif Lazaridis"?! https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/wool-and-the-indo-anatolian-hypothesis-a-linguistic-and-archaeological-approach From Ganj Dareh in Iran to the North Mesopotamia and then the Lower Volga Steppes.

This study says: "While the Anatolia_N component remains stable over the centuries, the Iran_N one sharply increases starting from 200 BCE", and the study about Ancient Greeks says: "Both the Bronze Age Minoans and Mycenaeans derived most of their ancestry from a Neolithic Anatolian population...

You are right but I said "a group of Iranians", not "Persians", Persians lived in Persia, a region in the south of Iran: We know some different peoples lived in Iran and some of them migrated to different regions during the Achaemenid era, for example Hyrcanians who lived in the northeast of...

Persians strongly believed a large part of Europe belonged to them, Old Persian inscriptions have been found as far as Gherla in the northwest of Romania: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gherla several centuries after the fall of Achaemenid empire, the Sassanid king Shapur II (309—379 AD) writes...

That is a Persian myth, it is believed that the Roman Empire was found by Salm, borther of Iraj, ancestor of Iranians.

There are usually some facts behind the myths.

According to some Persian sources after the fall of the Persian empire and in the Alexander era, a group of Iranians who wanted to preserve their religion (Mithraism) migrated to the west and created the Roman empire. https://en.everybodywiki.com/R%C3%BBm_(Shahnameh)

Liburnians were an ancient people in the Near East, for example the Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II (884 – 859 BC) says: I had brought under my sway, from the land of Suhi, and from the whole of the land of Lake, and from the land of Sirku on the other side of the Euphrates, and from the farthest...

There is a big difference between "Iranian" as a sub-branch of Indo-Iranian people and "Iranian" as a people who lived in ancient Iran, Hittites who lived in modern Turkey were not Turk, whether by a direct or an indirect migration, a culture could spread from the northwest of Iran to Italy.

Northwest of Iran in the Bronze Age was the land of Lullubium (compare Lilybaeum/Lilubaeum, one of the oldest cities in Sicily), the greatest king of Lullubium was Anubanini: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anubanini from the name of the two faced god Ianu/Anu, compare Roman god Janus and Etruscan...

What does it prove?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/17bRaLO-CB5LiEFruE9TFccZXTrVDTmSA/view Abstract: The Iranian Plateau has long been important for cultural and demographic interchanges throughout history. This study focuses on a detailed analysis of 50 ancient skeletons from different Iranian sites, including...