Trump gets a lot of bad press especially outside the US and in particular for his manners, confrontational attitude and shocking comments. I have also heavily criticised him for his support of the fossil fuel industries and his dismissive attitude about global warming.
But regarding the support for the American fossil fuel industries, there may be a silver lining after all. One thing that I had not considered is that petrol extraction tends to be more environmentally friendly (if that isn't an oxymoron) in developed countries then in developing countries (Gulf states are with developing countries here, despite their high GDP per capita).
I asked chatGPT about it and here is the answer I got.
Yes, it is generally true that oil extraction in the United States is often cleaner and more environmentally friendly than in many developing countries, including some Gulf states. However, this comes with important nuances and considerations:
Why US Oil Extraction May Be Cleaner:
1. Stricter Environmental Regulations:
- The U.S. has stringent federal and state-level regulations enforced by agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These regulations often require the use of technologies to reduce emissions, control spills, and protect water and land.
- For example, U.S. producers often employ techniques like vapor recovery systems to capture emissions from storage tanks and pipelines.
2. Advanced Technology:
- U.S. companies typically use more advanced drilling and extraction technologies, such as precision horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, which can minimize waste and environmental disruption compared to older methods.
3. Transparency and Monitoring:
- The U.S. has systems in place for monitoring emissions, spills, and water contamination. Public data reporting and audits are often required, promoting greater accountability.
4. Focus on Methane Reduction:
- The U.S. has initiatives to reduce methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. For instance, some companies voluntarily participate in the EPA’s Methane Challenge Program to adopt practices that lower emissions.
---
Challenges in Developing Countries:
1. Lax Regulations:
- Many developing countries lack stringent environmental policies or enforcement mechanisms. This can lead to higher rates of flaring (burning excess gas), spills, and habitat destruction.
2. Aging Infrastructure:
- Gulf states and other developing regions often rely on older infrastructure, which is more prone to leaks and inefficiency.
3. Flaring and Venting:
- Gas flaring and venting are common in Gulf states due to a lack of infrastructure to capture and utilize associated gas, leading to significant greenhouse gas emissions.
4. Limited Oversight:
- Corruption, lack of transparency, and limited monitoring tools can result in unchecked environmental degradation in many developing countries.
---
Caveats and Criticisms:
1. Scale of Production:
- The sheer scale of U.S. oil production means that, despite cleaner practices per barrel, the total environmental impact (greenhouse gas emissions, water use, etc.) remains substantial.
2. Fracking Concerns:
- Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), a significant component of U.S. production, is controversial due to risks of groundwater contamination, induced seismicity (earthquakes), and heavy water usage.
3. Exporting Environmental Risks:
- The U.S. often exports its oil and gas extraction technologies and practices to other countries, where oversight might be weaker, potentially undermining environmental benefits.
---
Conclusion:
While U.S. oil extraction tends to be cleaner due to advanced technology, stricter regulations, and greater transparency, it is not without significant environmental impacts. Developing countries, including Gulf states, face greater challenges due to weaker oversight and infrastructure. However, both regions contribute substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting the broader need to transition to cleaner energy sources.
I have also mentioned before that if Trump imposes import tariffs on goods from all over the world and other countries reciprocate that would considerably decrease maritime traffic and cargo flights, which in turn would slightly decrease carbon emissions worldwide.
This video explains in a nonpartisan manner what Trump could do better than Biden and I tend to agree with their analysis.
But regarding the support for the American fossil fuel industries, there may be a silver lining after all. One thing that I had not considered is that petrol extraction tends to be more environmentally friendly (if that isn't an oxymoron) in developed countries then in developing countries (Gulf states are with developing countries here, despite their high GDP per capita).
I asked chatGPT about it and here is the answer I got.
Yes, it is generally true that oil extraction in the United States is often cleaner and more environmentally friendly than in many developing countries, including some Gulf states. However, this comes with important nuances and considerations:
Why US Oil Extraction May Be Cleaner:
1. Stricter Environmental Regulations:
- The U.S. has stringent federal and state-level regulations enforced by agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These regulations often require the use of technologies to reduce emissions, control spills, and protect water and land.
- For example, U.S. producers often employ techniques like vapor recovery systems to capture emissions from storage tanks and pipelines.
2. Advanced Technology:
- U.S. companies typically use more advanced drilling and extraction technologies, such as precision horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, which can minimize waste and environmental disruption compared to older methods.
3. Transparency and Monitoring:
- The U.S. has systems in place for monitoring emissions, spills, and water contamination. Public data reporting and audits are often required, promoting greater accountability.
4. Focus on Methane Reduction:
- The U.S. has initiatives to reduce methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. For instance, some companies voluntarily participate in the EPA’s Methane Challenge Program to adopt practices that lower emissions.
---
Challenges in Developing Countries:
1. Lax Regulations:
- Many developing countries lack stringent environmental policies or enforcement mechanisms. This can lead to higher rates of flaring (burning excess gas), spills, and habitat destruction.
2. Aging Infrastructure:
- Gulf states and other developing regions often rely on older infrastructure, which is more prone to leaks and inefficiency.
3. Flaring and Venting:
- Gas flaring and venting are common in Gulf states due to a lack of infrastructure to capture and utilize associated gas, leading to significant greenhouse gas emissions.
4. Limited Oversight:
- Corruption, lack of transparency, and limited monitoring tools can result in unchecked environmental degradation in many developing countries.
---
Caveats and Criticisms:
1. Scale of Production:
- The sheer scale of U.S. oil production means that, despite cleaner practices per barrel, the total environmental impact (greenhouse gas emissions, water use, etc.) remains substantial.
2. Fracking Concerns:
- Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), a significant component of U.S. production, is controversial due to risks of groundwater contamination, induced seismicity (earthquakes), and heavy water usage.
3. Exporting Environmental Risks:
- The U.S. often exports its oil and gas extraction technologies and practices to other countries, where oversight might be weaker, potentially undermining environmental benefits.
---
Conclusion:
While U.S. oil extraction tends to be cleaner due to advanced technology, stricter regulations, and greater transparency, it is not without significant environmental impacts. Developing countries, including Gulf states, face greater challenges due to weaker oversight and infrastructure. However, both regions contribute substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting the broader need to transition to cleaner energy sources.
I have also mentioned before that if Trump imposes import tariffs on goods from all over the world and other countries reciprocate that would considerably decrease maritime traffic and cargo flights, which in turn would slightly decrease carbon emissions worldwide.
This video explains in a nonpartisan manner what Trump could do better than Biden and I tend to agree with their analysis.
Last edited:
