Anne Frances Spackman
Regular Member
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 3
That is very interesting about Bourbon-Busset y-dna and worth pursuing for someone into genetic testing of the ancient royal y-lines. Perhaps it would be R1b. I also wonder about the G2 of the presumed head of Henri IV.
I saw on a site that there was a genetic test done on a living member of the Habsburg-Lorraine dynasty who also belongs to haplogroup G2a:
www.geni.com
I do not of course know where to corroborate this result with more data. But, it is interesting that the male y-line I guess originally from the ancient noble house of Lorraine might have been G2a (the Hapsburg in the line of Hapsburg-Lorraine coming through the female line as I recall).
Anyway, I looked over the numbers I got for house Capet again in my dna results: House of Capet J1a2b1b2c1 (BY100/FGC14030/Y6915/ZS2926). I am really new to dna analysis, but I saw a few days ago that the number J1 haplogroup they gave me I now recognize as a mtdna haplogroup, though they gave it to me in relation to the y-line dna in that section with all of the other y-dna. I guess that this means that the dna haplogroup I received is associated with females of the Capetian dynasty and not the Capetian y-line.
So yes, perhaps there were no false paternity events up to the sons of Louis XIII: Louis XIV and Philippe, from the time of the earliest Capetians. But, the only way that the Capetian line might be unbroken is if the presumed head of Henri IV wasn't really his head after all. I read this online: "The head had a lesion near the nose, a pierced ear, and a healed facial wound, and the embalming methods used on the head matched those used at the time of the king's death."
This is an interesting article:
I do think it is possible, however, that Louis XIV and Philippe Bourbon Duc D'Orleans were possibly fathered by a noble/royal non-Bourbon from the house of Wettin or Saxe-Coburg and not by Louis XIII; so maybe it would help if Bourbon-Busset y-dna could be determined, and especially if it turned out to be r1b. Then perhaps we could see if Capetians and Wettins were related in the very distant past, and if the two sons of Louis XIII were biologically his own without actually being able to test Louis XIII, who apparently went bald early and wore wigs, so there are no hairs of his remaining today to do a dna test on them. However, it seems also that the Capetians of today who descend from these two sons of Louis XIII also descend from 2 sisters of Louis XIII, making them definitely descended from Henri IV Bourbon as well as other Bourbons further back in time, including Charles Bourbon Duc de Bourbon et D'Auvergne born in 1401 even if there was a false paternity event in Louis XIII's sons.
I saw on a site that there was a genetic test done on a living member of the Habsburg-Lorraine dynasty who also belongs to haplogroup G2a:

Habsburg Family DNA Project genealogy project
A collection of genealogical profiles related to Habsburg Family DNA Project
I do not of course know where to corroborate this result with more data. But, it is interesting that the male y-line I guess originally from the ancient noble house of Lorraine might have been G2a (the Hapsburg in the line of Hapsburg-Lorraine coming through the female line as I recall).
Anyway, I looked over the numbers I got for house Capet again in my dna results: House of Capet J1a2b1b2c1 (BY100/FGC14030/Y6915/ZS2926). I am really new to dna analysis, but I saw a few days ago that the number J1 haplogroup they gave me I now recognize as a mtdna haplogroup, though they gave it to me in relation to the y-line dna in that section with all of the other y-dna. I guess that this means that the dna haplogroup I received is associated with females of the Capetian dynasty and not the Capetian y-line.
So yes, perhaps there were no false paternity events up to the sons of Louis XIII: Louis XIV and Philippe, from the time of the earliest Capetians. But, the only way that the Capetian line might be unbroken is if the presumed head of Henri IV wasn't really his head after all. I read this online: "The head had a lesion near the nose, a pierced ear, and a healed facial wound, and the embalming methods used on the head matched those used at the time of the king's death."
This is an interesting article:
I do think it is possible, however, that Louis XIV and Philippe Bourbon Duc D'Orleans were possibly fathered by a noble/royal non-Bourbon from the house of Wettin or Saxe-Coburg and not by Louis XIII; so maybe it would help if Bourbon-Busset y-dna could be determined, and especially if it turned out to be r1b. Then perhaps we could see if Capetians and Wettins were related in the very distant past, and if the two sons of Louis XIII were biologically his own without actually being able to test Louis XIII, who apparently went bald early and wore wigs, so there are no hairs of his remaining today to do a dna test on them. However, it seems also that the Capetians of today who descend from these two sons of Louis XIII also descend from 2 sisters of Louis XIII, making them definitely descended from Henri IV Bourbon as well as other Bourbons further back in time, including Charles Bourbon Duc de Bourbon et D'Auvergne born in 1401 even if there was a false paternity event in Louis XIII's sons.