at first (bad?) sight you could be a Russian (but not "typical" or rather a Balt, more Lithuanian than Latvian, a guess), but you could be too, with less probaility, from Swede or Finland or Estonia, even from Germany or farther around - something 'nordic' but not only -
if I've time I 'll try to "break down your basic types components", knowing that the farthest we go into details the nearest we are to the ridicule (because at some point, some details we put on the account of recent crossings are in fact older stages before the raciation selection of these types (genetic is a slow dynamic but a dynamic: there is NO spontaneous generation): it occurred in Asia beofore separation towards 'europoide' and 'mongoloid' types, as in some Uralic populations -
at first (bad?) sight you could be a Russian (but not "typical" or rather a Balt, more Lithuanian than Latvian, a guess), but you could be too, with less probaility, from Swede or Finland or Estonia, even from Germany or farther around - something 'nordic' but not only -
if I've time I 'll try to "break down your basic types components", knowing that the farthest we go into details the nearest we are to the ridicule (because at some point, some details we put on the account of recent crossings are in fact older stages before the raciation selection of these types (genetic is a slow dynamic but a dynamic: there is NO spontaneous generation): it occurred in Asia beofore separation towards 'europoide' and 'mongoloid' types, as in some Uralic populations -
You have given us so many pictures of yourself, we are spoiled for choice. However you have not given one which would be useful for accurate classifying.
Envious blah blah