Ancient human-sloth hunt hinted at in 15,000-year-old footprints

Jovialis

Advisor
Messages
9,585
Reaction score
6,345
Points
113
Location
New York Metropolitan Area
Ethnic group
Italian
Y-DNA haplogroup
R-PF7566 (R-Y227216)
mtDNA haplogroup
H6a1b7
Sometime between 10,000 and 15,000 years ago, a giant ground sloth—a hairy, lumbering beast that weighed as much as a metric ton—wandered along a lakeshore in what is now southern New Mexico. Then, something spooked it. It reared up on its hind legs, swatted at its attackers, and then was lost to the ages.

The dramatic scene has been preserved for millennia in the first-ever trackways, or sets of fossilized footprints, that may chronicle human hunters in action against big prey. In some cases, the human prints lie inside those of the sloths, indicating hot pursuit. The find adds credence to the idea that, in the waning days of the last ice age, people may have played a large role in driving these creatures—as well as other giant mammals like mammoths and mastodons—to extinction.

“This is a fascinating find,” says Jordana Meyer, a conservation ecologist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, who wasn’t involved in the new study. She has worked extensively with native big-game trackers in Africa, and she says it’s plausible that the human-and-sloth trackways “show hunters in action.”

What was once a bucolic lakeside landscape is now a vast salt flat that’s part of White Sands National Monument. Limited access to the area, as well as its largely secret location, has helped keep the trackways there intact.
In the new study, Matthew Bennett, a sedimentologist at Bournemouth University in Poole, U.K., and his colleagues focused on the footprints and trackways made by giant ground sloths. When a sloth trackway isn’t near any other footprints, it generally takes a straight or slightly curving path. But when human footprints are also nearby, a sloth’s path sometimes takes sharp turns or indicates the animals reared up on their hind legs. This may have freed the creatures’ strong forelimbs—tipped with sharp claws—for defense, allowing them to swivel to and fro. In the process, they would have created smeared-out tracks and arc-shaped scuff marks that the researchers call “flailing circles,” the latter of which were reported for the first time today in Science Advances.

“That’s a radical change from just walking,” says Anthony Martin, a vertebrate paleontologist at Emory University in Atlanta who specializes in trace fossils such as footprints. The sloths “were obviously reacting to something in their environment,” very possibly humans, says Martin, who wasn’t involved in the new study.

The clincher, however, may be trackways at the site that include human footprints inside the larger footprints of the giant ground sloths. In those instances, says Bennett, the humans had to have been purposefully extending their stride to place their feet inside the sloths’ footprints. In these trackways, individual footprints are between 80 and 110 centimeters apart, but a normal human stride—based on the length of the footprint left behind—should measure only 60 centimeters or so.

Researchers have long (and hotly) debated the possible causes of late-ice-age extinctions of giant sloths, mammoths, and other large beasts. The new find, says Bennett, suggests that although factors like climate change and disease may have played a role, humans—armed with stone-tipped spears—may also have been a major factor, as they infiltrated North America after crossing a land bridge from Asia some 15,000 to 25,000 years ago.

But not all scientists are convinced the New Mexico trackways chronicle an ancient hunt. Bennett and his team “conclusively provide a really nice demonstration that big animals and people were frequenting the same places at the same time,” says Anthony Barnosky, a vertebrate paleontologist at Stanford and a colleague of Meyer who wasn’t involved in the study. However, ancient humans may have simply happened upon sets of fresh giant sloth tracks and then decided to walk in the same footprints, he says. “People visiting the beach might do the same sort of thing.”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/04/ancient-human-sloth-hunt-hinted-15000-year-old-footprints
 
Sometime between 10,000 and 15,000 years ago, a giant ground sloth—a hairy, lumbering beast that weighed as much as a metric ton—wandered along a lakeshore in what is now southern New Mexico. Then, something spooked it. It reared up on its hind legs, swatted at its attackers, and then was lost to the ages.

The dramatic scene has been preserved for millennia in the first-ever trackways, or sets of fossilized footprints, that may chronicle human hunters in action against big prey. In some cases, the human prints lie inside those of the sloths, indicating hot pursuit. The find adds credence to the idea that, in the waning days of the last ice age, people may have played a large role in driving these creatures—as well as other giant mammals like mammoths and mastodons—to extinction.

“This is a fascinating find,” says Jordana Meyer, a conservation ecologist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, who wasn’t involved in the new study. She has worked extensively with native big-game trackers in Africa, and she says it’s plausible that the human-and-sloth trackways “show hunters in action.”

What was once a bucolic lakeside landscape is now a vast salt flat that’s part of White Sands National Monument. Limited access to the area, as well as its largely secret location, has helped keep the trackways there intact.
In the new study, Matthew Bennett, a sedimentologist at Bournemouth University in Poole, U.K., and his colleagues focused on the footprints and trackways made by giant ground sloths. When a sloth trackway isn’t near any other footprints, it generally takes a straight or slightly curving path. But when human footprints are also nearby, a sloth’s path sometimes takes sharp turns or indicates the animals reared up on their hind legs. This may have freed the creatures’ strong forelimbs—tipped with sharp claws—for defense, allowing them to swivel to and fro. In the process, they would have created smeared-out tracks and arc-shaped scuff marks that the researchers call “flailing circles,” the latter of which were reported for the first time today in Science Advances.

“That’s a radical change from just walking,” says Anthony Martin, a vertebrate paleontologist at Emory University in Atlanta who specializes in trace fossils such as footprints. The sloths “were obviously reacting to something in their environment,” very possibly humans, says Martin, who wasn’t involved in the new study.

The clincher, however, may be trackways at the site that include human footprints inside the larger footprints of the giant ground sloths. In those instances, says Bennett, the humans had to have been purposefully extending their stride to place their feet inside the sloths’ footprints. In these trackways, individual footprints are between 80 and 110 centimeters apart, but a normal human stride—based on the length of the footprint left behind—should measure only 60 centimeters or so.

Researchers have long (and hotly) debated the possible causes of late-ice-age extinctions of giant sloths, mammoths, and other large beasts. The new find, says Bennett, suggests that although factors like climate change and disease may have played a role, humans—armed with stone-tipped spears—may also have been a major factor, as they infiltrated North America after crossing a land bridge from Asia some 15,000 to 25,000 years ago.

But not all scientists are convinced the New Mexico trackways chronicle an ancient hunt. Bennett and his team “conclusively provide a really nice demonstration that big animals and people were frequenting the same places at the same time,” says Anthony Barnosky, a vertebrate paleontologist at Stanford and a colleague of Meyer who wasn’t involved in the study. However, ancient humans may have simply happened upon sets of fresh giant sloth tracks and then decided to walk in the same footprints, he says. “People visiting the beach might do the same sort of thing.”

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/04/ancient-human-sloth-hunt-hinted-15000-year-old-footprints

Something about the name made me think they'd be hideous, but they're not so bad. :) I wonder if they were good eating, although I think our ancestors ate anything that wouldn't eat them!

Giant-ground-sloth-tracks.jpg
 
^^
xHkl5cj.jpg


This thing probably could have feed a village. They probably got a lot out of it's fur in terms of clothing as well.
 
^^
xHkl5cj.jpg


This thing probably could have feed a village. They probably got a lot out of it's fur in terms of clothing as well.

OMG! I had no idea they were so huge. Our ancestors had to be very brave to survive.
 
kill it with fire
 
OMG! I had no idea they were so huge. Our ancestors had to be very brave to survive.

I agree, it was probably a dangerous undertaking. I also wonder, considering homo sapiens were social, they were probably better able to hunt these animals, which was certainly a group effort. This could also be a reason why they outlasted the Neanderthals, who had smaller numbers in their groups. Another study that I posted about said that megafauna extinctions matched human migrations. So they probably partly facilitated the displacement of the Neanderthals by eliminating their food sources.
 
I agree, it was probably a dangerous undertaking. I also wonder, considering homo sapiens were social, they were probably better able to hunt these animals, which was certainly a group effort. This could also be a reason why they outlasted the Neanderthals, who had smaller numbers in their groups. Another study that I posted about said that megafauna extinctions matched human migrations. So they probably partly facilitated the displacement of the Neanderthals by eliminating their food sources.

That's another good point. You would definitely need coordination to take down such a huge animal.

There's a lot of converging evidence coming out about the fact that Neanderthals just couldn't compete with sapiens sapiens despite the clear bias among the usual Nordicist types because they like the fact that they might have been more light skinned than the original OOA migrants.

Facts are inconvenient things.
 
The modern sloths are soooo cute, though!! Especially when they hug the branches, i want one
 
The modern sloths are soooo cute, though!! Especially when they hug the branches, i want one

I've seen some and even interacted with one when I went to a natural park in Belém, in the Brazilian Amazon. They are simultaneously the cutest and the most boring animals on earth! LOL
 
I've seen some and even interacted with one when I went to a natural park in Belém, in the Brazilian Amazon. They are simultaneously the cutest and the most boring animals on earth! LOL

I would get one if not for the sharp claws (and I'm not sure if they've been domesticated). It's cruel to declaw them. I just have a thing for lemurs, weasels, aye-ayes, and sloths, they are cuter than ever.
 
If I ever get around to owning one, I would name him "Chill" with the nickname "Pretzel Sloth" bc i would feed him pretzel sticks lol it would be even more cute to see the guy grasping a pretzel stick and hearing him crunching and munching on it, and who knows? I could make him a YouTube sensation with that very same nick and the first vid would be "Pretzel Sloth Eats a Pretzel".

Sorry for the off topic, just that this thread got me further into sloths for some reason :)
 
That's another good point. You would definitely need coordination to take down such a huge animal.

There's a lot of converging evidence coming out about the fact that Neanderthals just couldn't compete with sapiens sapiens despite the clear bias among the usual Nordicist types because they like the fact that they might have been more light skinned than the original OOA migrants.

Facts are inconvenient things.

I think that for a well-trained and well-coordinated group of hunters these giant slots were an easy prey.
That goes for all megafauna, and particularly for such a slow-moving giant slot.
Hunting such animal for a single hunter would be quite useless, but if he has a whole tribe to feed it is interesting.

In southern Australia, there was a similar animal, the diprotodon.
It went extinct shortly after first humans arrived in the area, some 49 ka.

1200px-Diprotodon_optatum_%282%29.jpg

Diprotodon-opatum-size-738x591.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diprotodon
 
I think that for a well-trained and well-coordinated group of hunters these giant slots were an easy prey.
That goes for all megafauna, and particularly for such a slow-moving giant slot.
Hunting such animal for a single hunter would be quite useless, but if he has a whole tribe to feed it is interesting.
In southern Australia, there was a similar animal, the diprotodon.
It went extinct shortly after first humans arrived in the area, some 49 ka.
1200px-Diprotodon_optatum_%282%29.jpg

Diprotodon-opatum-size-738x591.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diprotodon

I would have been more than happy to stay at home and cook it for you when you returned, Bicicleur, and even make you a very cozy, warm, cloak. :)
 
Back
Top