Holy words! So I wasn't the only person to realize that many people have a sort of orgasm when dealing with Corded Ware and axes/weapons and steppe ancestry... I read many books about the argument and I made the idea that, in history, we tended to overestimate the role and the culture itself of...
My two cents:
I always say that genealogic genetics must be tied to some principles of documental genealogy: a surname was born at the beginning of the XI century in place A, then in the XI, XIII and XIV centuries it remained in place A, but in the XV century some bearers of that surname...
Thanks for suggestion Sile, but, frankly, I'm not interested at all about my haplogroup: its origins are somewhat understood now. I'm much more interested in R1b, the greatest mystery in European history!
So, why its admixture is unreliable, but its attribution to haplogroup R-M269 is reliable?
Richard Rocca on Anthrogenica noticed that in the site where ATP3 is buried there is a wrist guard and arrow points.
And, the last thing, probably, ATP2 and ATP3 weren't connected to each other at all...
Humour just doesn't work...
I don't understand a thing, and I wrote this post another time in this forum: why - I pray for an answer - when it comes to talk about R1b then all theories about its connection with IE speakers MUST be ridiculous and biased? Why R1b only must be the most maltreated...
I saw the link... and I keep seeing that ATP3 has 30% cca of Northern MIddle Eastern, 4% cca of Northern mongoloid, and the least percentage of Neolithic European...
And, yes, I suppose Geneticker's way of expression towards other bloggers is somewhat rude...
I read on Eurogenesblog of Davidski that also Maykop culture Y-DNA will be revealed... so it could show the apportion of EHG, EEF and the Teal admixture in other similar cultures. But also, it could be the revelation of R1b and R1a history.
He didn't test for V88: he tested the sample for V88 major subclades, i.e. V69 and V35, and resulted negative. However it tested positive for V88 equivalent SNP. The x mean that it is negative for specific subclades tested: so, R1b1c2 and R1b1c3... not R1b1c!
I'm sorry, but I can't agree: we have M269 in Neolithic Spain (M269 with no sub-clades recognized), and we have M269 with subclades in Eastern Europe (L23 and Z2103). Then, how can the M269 guy from Spain develop, in the same time but at the very end of a continent, the same mutation of L23 that...
I see Genetiker link for that presumed R1b individual: he has many calls on multiple haplogroups! How is possible? I see Haplogroup Q, haplogroup E, haplogroup R... Perhaps Gemetiker hopped to hurry conclusions...
The authors give only two Y-DNA results.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.