Search results

The only way to do it is from Linux , I don't think think there is Windows version, at least I don't use it. I use Ubuntu VM for the conversion. The command is convertf -p parameters_file In parameters_file you specify the filenames that should be converted and the output file names. In...

yes, I do it .

What we are missing in these tables are: Maykop culture and also some central Asia cultures , like: Otrar culture. Otrar is later culture, however we have many other old populations in Central Asia like MA1. Maykop culture is exactly a mixture between european and central Asia. Yamnaya...

Mit DNA is not enough these days. We need the full autosomal picture. We still have few other examples of Canary Islanders . For example this one: gun011 from RodriguezVarelaCurrentBiology2017 is more valuable than all the Mit DNAs. gun011 individual is the most closely related to TAF...

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.093 Most of the men are N1a1a1a1a3a .

Was someone able to convert this data in PLINK or more compatible format ? Downloading 5G for each individual , converting etc.. is a huge work.. Any suggestions how we can get this data easier ?

.. removed

I checked who is the most similar to Etruscans and I compared with some new samples from KapitanAndreevo from the latest dataset. I can say these are almost between the Etruscans. Here is the list of the individuals to verify: TAQ001 TAQ024 TAQ017 TAQ005 TAQ015 TAQ018...

Thanks, could you share your script for FST distance? What dataset are you using for this calculation ? The latest one for SouthernArk ?

duplicate .. deleted

There is excess of information. With more than 60% we still get a good picture .

Of course they are not in the anno. Data in the anno doesn't include the latest Anatolia dataset. It may take another 5-6 months before they create the new full dataset with all recent data. However all the information for the latest individuals is provided in the excel sheet provided with...

Yes, the latest one for Anatolia. Here are the source and target data I used:

Distance to: Norwegian.DG:S_Norwegian-1.DG 0.05588223 Georgian.DG:S_Georgian-2.DG 0.06046173 Georgian.DG:S_Georgian-1.DG 0.15577206 RUS_Yamnaya_Samara_EBA:I0231_published 0.15692885 RUS_Yamnaya_Samara_EBA:I0443 0.16091221 IRN_GanjDareh_PostMdv:I1955 0.16186137...

I used the example from Davidski to test my data and Global-25 / vahaduo.github.io/g25views/#WestEurasia . In general most of the numbers are matching those of Davidski. I am not yet sure how the site vahaduo is processing their calculations. My goal was to test the site vahaduo.

Global 25 are using 25 dimensions for their PCA analysis. You do the distance matrix, then scale it for the first 25 principal components. I do full calculation for 35 dimensions, then I take only the first 25 to convert for Global25 data format.

I created my own Global-25 dataset (PCA data). I tried to reproduce the data from Eurogenes blog for Phrygians. Here are my results: Target: TUR_C_Kalehöyük_MLBA:MA2200_final.SG Distance: 2.5543% / 0.02554308 40.8 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_Hofmanova_N 25.2 MKD_Anc_outlier1 18.6 ISR_MLBA...

It is good that Erhan Elhaik bring this problem for more attention for the scientific comunity. There is such issue and I was also trying to explain about it, however it is a lot of work just to explain the issue, give some examples, show the limitations etc.. Erhan did some work about this...

The easiest way - you take a screenshot or save the results as png or pdf file. However you may save it in another file - for example text file. I created my own scripts to save such data. I can share, but it's not perfect. It just work for me. To save: # Find the best result min_score <-...

See in the other topic: Data quality control