Search results

too later i think

How was probably phenotype of these proto-celts and proto-italics?

I'm curious to know what the phenotype of these proto-Celts and proto-Italics was like, would be similar to the people of southern Germany or some other place??

Celts and proto-italics had high steppe and low whg?

she had contact with tribes with high farmer

Yes , celts from south had more contact with ancient tribes with higher farmer , so is normal steppe be lower on them than celts from central and north france

Thanks for the answers, one doubt I have, how did the split of the proto Celtics and proto Italics from alps before 1800 bce occur, they were basically the same people? because i know both have same father R-U152 , R-L2 what differentiate them is just language and culture? phenotype probably...

R-Z49 is too strong northeast italy but some subclades from R-S8183 do not look like italic , but veneto has a strong conection with R-Z49 , R-S8183 father R-S8172 , but a lot people from north germany and scandinavia test positive to R-Y4353 father from R-S8172

I mean celts and proto-italic from alps region in some moment had exactly same phenotype because both son of R-P312 father R-L21, R-U152 ..., all of them had high steppe when these proto italic began to have contact with another ancient tribes with higher farm the things began to change

Is basic people coming from north had a higher steppe and south high farmer

This is literally impossible , celtic and proto-itallic both had the same ancient father so they had same phenotype , they had a high steppe , celtic and italic is just a culture , language , when these people from alps migrated to northeast italy they got another phenotype because contact with...

Impossible because oldest R-U152 samples was found regions between bohemia , bavaria and alps , this is too older than romans, this clade born in europe central with proto-celtic and italic people , these people later desenvolved celtic and italic languages but was basically same people because...

Some subclades from R-S8183 from maciamos tree dont look like italic

yes , i noticed that aswell, this haplo is spread between northeast italy , croatia , slovenia , so what i can say my major haplo is a mix celtic and italic and some moment of history some people from these clades R-U152 and R-L2 coming from alps regions/bavaria/bohemia went to northeast italy...

Dorian , i am R-Z49 , R-S8183 , R-S8172 final clade that means my ancient ancestors is only proto-italic or a mix between celts and italics?

people with R-Y4353 and R-Y4354 is only descedeants of proto-italics and illyrians or they are a mix between celts R-L2 and italics R-Z49?

i thought R-Z49 was celtic , so i am descendeant of only italic people or is a mix of R-L2 celts and later italic people R-Z49?

So how R-L2 after become italic or celt? Who was the R-L2?

Hello i am R-Z49 , R-S8172 my haplo probably come from proto italic people?

really , is hard to awnser that , ancestors from R-S8172 look too shifted to north maybe it came with suebis , R-Y4353 , R-Y4354 hotzone look like north germany , only explanation i can to say would be maybe suebis or another germanic tribe R-Y4353...