Search results

as your from northeast italy , algorithm from them is trying to put a average between populations with similarity between italics and celts , you came from a region had a lot cisalpine gauls and proto-italics , illyrians aswell but iberians also receive illyrians probably because north italy...

mine results changed a little bit aswell but as is 2-Way i can't get a better fit , but basically now shows celtics , germanics , moors , roma+iberia but before was only moors , roma+iberia and germanics Gaul + Al-Andalus (17.64) Gaul + Moor (17.64) Thuringii + Al-Andalus (18.05) Thuringii +...

By your results we can know probably your ancient tribes is a mix of ancient iberian tribes , celts/germanic , italics , moors , nice results

Try to erase north italy because there s too similarity between west iberia and north italy

i ve a lot of samples mainly from galicia where steppes reach almost 40% and average to portugal mainly south and central would from 28% to 31% , there s a lot of samples from these regions where we can see with a good ancient calculator that north had more impact from northern euro than south ...

In average visigoths and suebians let a little genetic impact in iberia but there s regions where their genetic is really higher , region between galicia and north portugal there s a lot of samples that match with southern and central germany regions where suebians came from , estimation +-...

Its not possible without a deep subclade

In this calc without my mixed pops would be Iberia_BA : 50,77% Germanic_Ruler : 29,85% Imperial_Romans : 12,31% Berbers&Gaunches : 6,77% Phoenincians_of_iberia : 0,30% Target: nightmarecity_scaled Distance: 1.3480% / 0.01348042 33.0 Iberia_BA 19.8 SSA 19.4 Germanic_Ruler...

is too probably celtic and roman , R-U152 is too strong between proto-celts and proto-italic , that has no mystery but forget to try associate a ancient haplogroup from BA to a specific tribe , is too old to associate , but you know that haplo is common to celtic and proto-italic tribes , so if...

Suebians was most probably R-U106, R-U152 in northwest iberia most probably came from a celtic tribe or roman period

Kirg can you send me your coords to archive coords here , i am trying to find a person with iberian ancestry coords

https://pastebin.com/mzP4sxrJ Can post with no distance and 0,25x please

My result is with imput aswell , before i did receive iberia + nw france and norway after only iberia + norway with imputed but i dont know what is more correct because i dont know why i receive norway , i know that west iberia is accurate

I am mostly iberian , i didnt find until now some iberian person pulled nw europe in modern origins conservative , normally is only west iberia and east iberia , sometimes italy , what said to me it could be a proxy, here result 2 different raw data in conservative mode

As far as I researched, the major haplogroup our R-Z49 seems to have been born in the north of the Alps +- 2400 BCE and at some point they spread to various parts of the continent, a part of R-S8183 is very common in ancient venetii tribes, very common in northeast Italy, Slovenia, Croatia but...

Yes L2 is common in venetto , northeast italy , north italy in general is more Z56

Honestly i give up , i am just talking about R-U152 , R-L2 , both have celtic clades and proto-italic clades that means some moment they shared same ancient ancestors , i didnt say they was from same tribe but how they came from same father these two different lineages shared something in some...

How difficult is it for you to understand something so simple, I'm not talking about culture or language here, I'm just talking about genetics, so it's literally impossible for these people at some point in history not to have shared anything genetically, this is already a problem of logic

What you typed doesn't make any logical sense, they both came from the same father, so it's obvious that the lineage that gave rise to the Celts and the other lineage that gave rise to the Proto-Italic at some point in history shared many things in common, both came from the same father but at...

Is obvious proto italic is different from celtic , when proto italic people splited from celtic their genetic , culture , language began to change but before that happen both shared a lot of things in common , celtic , italic is just a culture , language and that have nothing to do with...