Search results

Georgia and Armenia are supposed to differ in Levant Neolithic, nothing weird about that but the CHG/Iran N merged proxy might was taking some of the PPNB from Georgia since Georgians have much more CHG than Iran N. I'm going to make another table but with normal CHG Kotias vs Iran N Ganj...

I wasn't planning to model Iranians originally so i had to add 2 East Eurasian reference pops for them that i didn't use on the rest of the models, the results don't change anyway if i add it to the others, so i don't have to remake them. I didn't like the older charts i made on another...

Added a few more populations:

Are you satisfied now. Edit manually rotated some important ones and fixed Peloponnese_N typo

Why is it a bad model? Explain me with qpAdm models.

Merged Caucasus Hunter Gatherer Satsurblia + Iran N to estimate total CHG/Iran N related ancestry

This is not finished yet, i might change a right pop and i will also model more people. But overally i think it's pretty good. When it comes to Anatolian HG vs Natufian admix. Sadly we don't have high coverage Iran Mesolithic samples so i can make it an all mesolithic model.

I know that they are very similar percentage wise but they are not identical and have thousands of years of drift from each other, they are also different Enough that Iranians score 35% Iran N and 14% CHG while Georgians score 32% CHG and 10.5% Iran N. There is obviously some distinction. For...

Yes, the the model with Morocco_en shows realistic levels of Natufian in Southern Italy. In my older models like i said the Natufian was inflated because i couldnt use Morocco_En. About North Italy, it had higher STD errors than the other models, also i didnt check what North Italian regions...

Pay attention to the Standard Errors. And most importantly Steppe does not have CHG but has a ghost component related to CHG and Iran N.

I thought about Taforalt mixing in before more Dzudzuana moved down to make Natufian but it could also just be excess Basal Eurasian in Iran N

Some extra models because i used Natufian as a proxy on the chart. Their CHG/iran N related admix seems to be a bit more related to CHG than Iran N but it's pretty close

I don't know. I don't have enough data to determine where they lived and i dont know where they received the East Eurasian from.

Also Iran N and CHG were drifted apart for many thousands of years which made them easier to separate. The problem is that Steppe has neither of those but has a ghost CHG/Iran N related ancestry. I dont know if their deep ancestry is Basal Eurasian or African, Lazaridis didnt specify on that...

Even the creator of G25 pointed out that its not perfect. I mainly use G25 to run quick models before confirming them on qpAdm.

They are drifted and different enough for qpAdm to tell them apart despite their very similar paleolithic components. In almost all models i had low STD errors They have thousands or even 10,000 years of separation (not total isolation). Also Steppe does not even have direct CHG Kotias or Iran...

I might add more populations another time and change a bit the left and right pops. The Italian_North's Natufian seems inflated here because Iran N underinflated, probably because the Standard Errors were high on that model for some reason. Edit: i'm gonna remake this because i had to remove...

You do realize that for Sicilians to get 10% Natufian they would need much more North African admix than Canaanite related?

Then why does qpAdm show 10% Natufian in Sicilians.

And deflates it to normal levels on G25.