Yes, I get results closer to Italians than most of the southeastern Europeans. Its probably because North Macedonians (where most of my ancestry is from) are more Balkan, less Slavs.
Did not bought their Y-DNA and mtDNA analysis, as I already got it from yfull, but their ethnicity estimator was literally the only one that assigned me some eastern European (about 8-9%). All other tests assessed me as about either 0-1% eastern Euro.
Why is it pointless? Maybe its pointless for you because you're not member of that subclade, but for some of us that are members we find that information interesting, especially if our own subclades that we belong to split off very early on.
Target: who_cares_scaled
Distance: 3.3894% / 0.03389360
59.4 Balkan_N
24.6 East_European_Hunter_Gatherer
11.6 CHG_Georgia_Kotias.SG
2.6 Zagros_N
1.8 WHG
Its kind of similar to my FamilyTreeDNA ancient origins
Balto-Slavic split is pure theory. I wouldn't assign it too much value. Real Slavic origin estimation as a recognizable group of people is somewhere between 3rd and 8th century CE
I-Y3120's estimated TMCRA is quite before supposed Slavic ethnogenesis (or at least supposed ethnogenesis based on historic records). Even some of the subclades are too early to be connected to Slavs, although the present day population tested are mostly if not all Slavs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.