Recent content by PaleoRevenge

We know Thracians were E-V13, so they have to be Cotofeni, the presentation in Hungary did not hint whatsoever to Cotofeni being a dead-end. The question is under whose influence were the successors of Cotofeni eventually Aryanized (to the extend they no longer spoke a neolithic language)...

Interesting quote from the Bulgarian forum: https://www.forumnauka.bg/topic/26261-25-anatoliysko-vizantiyski-komponent-v-svremennite-blgari/page/8/ This is insider table talk as Kristiansen has not publicly communicated this. Based on internal data, one of the top names thinks Thracian is...

I don't know what Stamov has seen. It could be the IBD analysis with Shtike(likely an early Vlach) and the post-Kukes samples. Could be based on specific haplogroup branche reads. He also plays around with G25(as seen in his first video where he leaked E-V13) and might have unofficial...

Crazy or not, he provides some leaks. We have nothing from Serbia, no idea what samples are being processed from there, other than 1,200 BC project. One can back in to what rrenjet knows by listening carefully to what they say and how they say it. And what they chose to leave out. But if you are...

In the Hungarian conference "Tranformation of Europe in the 3rd Millennium BC", they had a presentation for Cotofeni, in the Day 2 video(first presentation of Day 2). They were quite clear that Cotofeni people survived, as for DNA samples the speaker replied that we have to wait until the...

Stamov was referring to the survival of a unaltered Thracian population in 7-8th century AD, their data detected such a population around Timok. I personally think they did not take more samples, as this population would likely be present in other parts of western Bulgaria. Location wise they...

This is from the link in researchgate, from the pdf: I would think they were doing a primitive form of aDNA comparison that would function like a G25 single distance comparison, but without the 25 coordinates. Stenislav Stamov did a new interview two days ago and it was posted in youtube and...

Some fraud checking analysis: as a comparison, this is how BA Romania samples plot, which rrenjet admin has tried to argue of continuity into the Iron Age, and thus E-V13s cannot be from the region. The north Thracian samples from 2004-2011 do not show any relationship to the prior EBA...

In 2004 there were DNA samples taken from Babadag and Bessarabi cultures(at least Bassarabi region wise). Paleo-mtDNA analysis and population genetic aspects of old Thracian populations from South-East of Romania...

https://www.forumnauka.bg/topic/26261-25-anatoliysko-vizantiyski-komponent-v-svremennite-blgari/ There is a second thread where he discloses more about BA Bulgaria and Thracians.

I think you are lumping the other groups the Lemkos, Rusyns, and Boykos all as one and the same with the Hutsuls. Those groups look like Slavs with some deviation. I found the study that will be released and sadly no sample from Hustul territory, all samples are from further west which are just...

The Rusyn project shows 14% E-V13. https://www.familytreedna.com/public/carpatho-rusyn?iframe=yresults However the Hutsul stick out, because their men do not look Slavic, and I doubt their aDNA is different. They must have very different Y-DNA portfolio. A really strange group, living in a...

A few months back someone posted a abstract of a study about the modern populations of Bukovina(raw data not yet published). I am curious of the sampling as recently I became aware of the Hustuls and the last Dacian archeological culture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpathian_Tumuli_culture...

You're right, were the G25s converted back in February or are they fresh from Davidski's oven?

The raw data for the Carpathian post-Roman paper is out, posted by Radko in genarchivist: https://www.theytree.com/portal/index/samples?keyword=Network%20of%20large%20pedigrees%20reveals%20social%20practices%20of%20Avar%20communities...