Again, I don't think there is conspiracy or whatever.. But it the same happens again: here is next place to check up: academia.edu . You may find many publications available there.
The expiry date for eupedia.com is 2026. So for the next 2 years this domain should be up and running. Thanks god !
Registry Expiry Date2026-12-08T13:41:17Z
FYI: I also don't think there is conspiracy... Crap things happens ..
However in case if this forum goes down, please someone to provide an alternative link .. In case if this forum is also shut down in the next 1-2 days.. We never know.. I have many more reasons to think there is some...
F-stats were used to prove the link between Papuans and Denisov.
F-stats were also used to prove the amount of Neanderthal components in European and other Eurasians.
Imagine if all this is wrong ? Imagine if the highest amount of Denisova and Neanderthal components are in the Africans ?
That...
There are some issues with the usage of F-stats. In addition, the existing version for Denisovan admixture in Papuans could be entirely wrong. We just started some conversations in such topics when the forum was shut down.
That't not enough. The admin guy should already provided us some backup access doesn't matter if genarchivist.somethingelse or
genarchivist.free-forums.net.
I suspect there is some conspiracy behind.. The main scientific guildia may not be happy of the ideas posted on genarchivist.
It's not...
There should be some direct link to the forum without using the domain. Something like: free-forums.net/genarchivist..
They can share the link.. Unless if it is on dedicated server. But still it should be accessible by IP address. I hope no need to start re-creating the forum from Zero.
whois:genarchivist.comFind Problems
whois
NameValue
RegistrarPDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Name ServerNS1.SUSPENDED-DOMAIN.COM
Name ServerNS2.SUSPENDED-DOMAIN.COM
The domain is still in suspended status. It seems the owner forgot to renew it.
Very interesting publication..
D. Reich is in the list of the authors and we are expecting to see the new data on David Reich Lab site.
It's not there yet. It seems they have some challentes to interpretate their data.. So it will be very interesting to see this data.
There is easy way how to avoid this.
You have to filter the samples being merged to the large dataset to only those SNPs already existing in the large dataset, else the extraneous SNPs in the sample that don't occur in the large forces the large to add No Calls to every sample in it swelling...
There was a recent publication claming similar not too far ago.. So this ChatCPT creation is a good example of Google Search . You posted this in another topic as well. Next time when you use ChatGPT do also your own search with Google or other search engines to see who is the original source...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.